Criticism mounts after several US media refuse to give presidential endorsements
Editorial boards at The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, and USA Today have announced they will not endorse a presidential candidate in the upcoming US election, sparking a backlash from readers. In this episode of Scoop, we look into how the decisions were made and whether presidential endorsements really matter in the first place. We're joined by Sewell Chan, executive editor at the Columbia Journalism Review.
Editorial boards at The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, and USA Today have announced they will not endorse a presidential candidate in the upcoming US election, sparking a backlash from readers. In this episode of Scoop, we look into how the decisions were made and whether presidential endorsements really matter in the first place. We're joined by Sewell Chan, executive editor at the Columbia Journalism Review.
This article has been sourced from various publicly available news platforms around the world. All intellectual property rights remain with the original publishers and authors. Unshared News does not claim ownership of the content and provides it solely for informational and educational purposes voluntarily. If you are the rightful owner and believe this content has been used improperly, please contact us for prompt removal or correction.
.jpg?#){kind=small}
/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/gray/YSYYKIUMGVGAHNG2RWEWTR7S5U.png)
